I recently read a book called “Lovie”- by Lisa Yarger, a story of a
nurse-midwife who delivered thousands of babies in eastern North Caroline in
the 50’s, 60’s, and 70’s, and 80’s - and 90’s! 50 years of being a
nurse-midwife!
I was delighted to read references to Frontier Nursing
Service and Frontier Midwifery School in the book. Lovie Shelton was a nurse
first – graduating from Norfolk General Hospital. Her first job was working
with a doctor who did home births and she loved going with him to support women
in labor and being in their homes. But she wanted to know more. So she went to
North Carolina University in Chapel Hill to get a degree in Public Health
nursing. But she was still interested in learning about birth and midwifery. The
faculty at North Caroline U. told her about FNU and Mary Breckinridge. So she
spent 3 months in the 40’s at Frontier with Mary Breckinridge and the midwives.
She was so impressed with not only their maternity skills but also that they
did so much primary care in the area completely without the aid or supervision
of a doctor.
She knew that midwifery was what she wanted to do so she
asked Mary Breckinbridge if she could get midwifery training at her school. Ms
Breckinbridge said she had every class filled up for the next four years. (I
had not known this happened!) But she told Lovie she could pull some strings
and get her into the Edinburg, Scotland school with a scholarship. So in 1949
Lovie went to Scotland for midwifery training and wouldn’t you know- Margaret
Myles –yes, the midwife who wrote the Myles Midwifery textbook was her teacher.
You know that after World War 1 the maternal mortality rate
in the U.S was between 6 and 700 per 100,000 – like what it is in the Congo or
Central Africa right now. And you know that the medical community started
paying attention to nurse-midwives when Mary Breckinbridge’s statistics in
southeastern Kentucky showed marked improvement over the rest of the country.
Once Lovie Shelton finished her nurse-midwifery training she
came back to the U.S. and looked for a place where she was needed. She got a
job setting up the health department in Beaufort county in North Carolina. She put
out the word that she was a trained midwife and started doing deliveries on the
side. The doctors supported her because
they did not want to deliver black women and poor women- before Medicaid there
was no money in it. They put her in charge of the granny-midwives and she
taught them and supervised them and sometimes took away their privileges if she
felt they were incompetent.
Lovie started a maternity clinic at the public health
department so that the granny-midwives could bring their patients to that. But
even so, most women who came to her clinic were still being delivered by the
granny-midwives. But her fame grew and more and more women called her for
deliveries. Sadly, she got a lot of flack from her fellow nurses who saw
midwifery as a dirty, shameful thing that brought down the stature of nursing.
Over the years granny midwives were being phased out, and Lovie
became very busy. She was becoming well-loved because of her skill and because
she treated each woman with compassion. She quit her public health job and was
on call 24/7. Once she delivered 196 babies in one year. Sometimes she was paid
and sometimes she was not.
Lovie always struggled working in a state that had no
regulation for nurse-midwives and legally she could do no more than the
granny-midwives could do. So she developed a 2-bag system. One was her granny
midwife bag- all the clean birth stuff like soap, clean razor blade, gloves,
and clean newspapers—and a 2nd bag with her BP cuff, stethoscope and
gloves. The first bag is what she would show the doctors. She had respect and
support from doctors until Medicaid came along and then they were not happy
with her- she had to lay low and be extra careful to take only low-risk moms.
She never lost a mom. She did lose some babies, most because she was called too
late.
So how does Lovie’s story relate to what I do?
I spend about 4-5 months a year in Haiti in the Central
Plateau district where there are 2 hospitals for over 725,000 people. There are also only around 7 obstetricians
for that many people. Calculating birth rate for it comes out to about 18,000
women that are going to need maternity care in one year. I am not certain I
have current numbers but there are about 12 nurse-midwives are working in the
Central Plateau- these are the university educated nurse-midwives recognized by
the International Confederation of Midwives. So guess who is doing over 75% of
the deliveries in the central plateau—yes, the granny-midwives, known as
matrones, still do the bulk of deliveries in rural Haiti. Even in the towns and
cities, women still use matrones because 1) they have no transportation to a
facility, 2) they have no money to pay the facility, 3) it is culturally
acceptable to birth at home, and 4) they claim they are treated badly at the
hospitals and clinics. So the maternal mortality in Haiti is about 350-450 per
100,000 depending on whose stats you look at. And- Currently only 9% of the
need for midwives is met in Haiti.
If you look at the State of Midwifery Report from 2014, you
can see that the most progress in combating maternal mortality is being made in
the countries with several levels of midwives- what the WHO calls
task-shifting. What we had here in this country was task-shifting when in 1932,
the White House Conference on Child Health and Protection found that when
granny midwives were trained, their infant mortality was no worse and sometimes
better than the doctors. So, training for granny midwives became standard in
public health departments.
We also know that CNM’s, CPM’s and birth centers and the
regulation of them has had a rocky history in our country largely because of
the financial implications for doctors and sometimes because of genuine concern
for safety.
My point is that countries wanting to make progress on maternal
mortality need to go through the same process- of starting with training
the traditional birth attendants and then educating midwives to differing
levels of competence, regulating what each level can do legally, and gradually
getting more and more highly trained nurse-midwives. In the U.S. we went
through an evolution from the granny midwives- who delivered most of the babies
in this country before the 1950’s, to regulation of the granny midwives, to
regulation of nurse-midwives- and we are still working on that in some states.
So that is what we are trying to do in Haiti. There are
thousands of uneducated traditional birth attendants who need training on when
to refer and need a constant supply of clean birth kits. Midwives For Haiti has
educated around 200 of them from 6 areas and are being asked to do more. We
distribute hundreds of clean birth kits per month and are constantly
needing more. We also train nurses who have varying levels of education, to be
skilled birth attendants. This means they can do all that the WHO says are the
core abilities of a skilled birth attendant. We have trained 124 of them. Haiti
does not have a title for them yet. Their diplomas simply say they are nurses
with advanced obstetrical training. But the government is taking notice. Unlike
the university-trained nurse-midwives in Haiti who have an attrition rate of
over 60%, only 2 of our graduates have left the country. The rest are working
in birth centers and hospitals all over Haiti and delivering around 9000 babies
per year. We are in collaboration with the Ministry of Health who is still in
the process of deciding how to regulate them. The Ministry of Health is hiring
them because they either cannot afford the nurse-midwives, or they cannot find
any nurse-midwives willing to work in rural areas.
An example of how the government views us is that in our
current class we have 4 nurses who automatically have jobs in rural clinics
working for the government when they are finished. We are in conversation with
the government about how to regulate them and what tasks they can do legally.
Just as in this country- a variety of midwives are needed in
Haiti to meet the need.
With a rising maternal mortality rate here in the U.S. we
are in desperate need of connecting nurse-midwives to the women who need them
most. The coming years it is going to be a challenge for the poorest in this
country to access the care we are so good at providing. I challenge all the alumni of Frontier to be
pioneers for finding ways to enable the women in their communities to use them
for their maternity care from prenatal care to deliveries to postpartum and
family planning and their primary health care. Women in the U.S. need us. We
may need to rock the boat just like Mary Breckinbridge did and Lovie Shelton
did. Let’s not be afraid to do it to save the lives of mothers and babies-
whether it is in this country or another. Countries like Angola, Sudan, the Dominican Republic of Congo- they are
not on the ICM’s map because they do not have nurse-midwifery regulated. But
that should not stop us from trying to train whoever is doing the births- in any country. In
order to change lives we may need to do just what Lovie did in this country- carry two bags. One that is legal and one that
rocks the boat but changes the world.
I love this, Nadene...when are you going to write your story? You write eloquently. That last line is awesome, what a great motto for life. You truly are one of a kind.
ReplyDelete